|
|
JSLint?JSLint is a JavaScript
program that looks for problems in JavaScript programs.
When C was
a young programming
language, there were several common programming errors that were not caught
by the primitive compilers, so an accessory program called lint
was developed which would scan a source file, looking for problems.
As the language matured, the definition of the language was
strengthened to eliminate some insecurities, and compilers got better
at issuing warnings. lint is no longer needed.
JavaScript is a young-for-its-age
language. It was originally intended to do small tasks in webpages, tasks
for which Java was too heavy and clumsy. But JavaScript is a very capable
language, and it is now being used in larger projects. Many of the features
that were intended to make the language easy to use are troublesome for
larger projects. A lint for JavaScript is needed: JSLint,
a JavaScript syntax checker and validator.
JSLint takes a JavaScript source and scans it. If it finds
a problem, it returns a message describing the problem and an approximate
location within the source. The problem is not necessarily a syntax error,
although it often is. JSLint looks at some style conventions
as well as structural problems. It does not prove that your program is
correct. It just provides another set of eyes to help spot problems.
JSLint defines a professional subset of JavaScript, a stricter
language than that defined by Edition
3 of the ECMAScript Language Specification. The subset is related
to recommendations found in Code
Conventions for the JavaScript Programming Language.
JavaScript is a sloppy language, but inside it there is an elegant, better
language. JSLint helps you to program in that better language
and to avoid most of the slop.
JSLint can operate on JavaScript source, HTML source, or JSON text.
JavaScript's biggest
problem is its dependence on global variables, particularly implied
global variables. If a variable is not explicitly declared (usually with
the var statement), then JavaScript assumes that the variable
was global. This can mask misspelled names and other problems.
JSLint expects that all variables and functions are declared
before they are used or invoked. This allows it to detect implied global
variables. It is also good practice because it makes programs easier to
read.
Sometimes a file is dependent on global variables and functions that
are defined elsewhere. You can identify these to JSLint by
including a comment in your file that lists the global functions and objects
that your program depends on, but that are not defined in your program
or script file.
A global declaration can look like this:
/*global getElementByAttribute, breakCycles, hanoi */
A global declaration starts with /*global. Notice that there
is no space before the g. You can have as many /*global
comments as you like. They must appear before the use of the variables
they specify.
Some globals can be predefined for you. Select the Assume a browser
(browser) option (see Options below) to predefine the standard
global properties that are supplied by web browsers, such as window
and document and alert. Select the Assume
Rhino (rhino) option to predefine the global properties
provided by the Rhino environment. Select the Assume a Yahoo Widget
(widget) option to predefine the global properties provided
by the Yahoo! Widgets environment.
Since JavaScript is a loosely-typed, dynamic-object language, it is not
possible to determine at compile time if property names are spelled correctly.
JSLint provides some assistance with this.
At the bottom of its report, JSLint displays a /*members*/
comment. It contains all of the names and string literals that were used
with dot notation, subscript notation, and object literals to name the
members of objects. You can look through the list for misspellings. Member
names that were only used once are shown in italics. This is to make misspellings
easier to spot.
You can copy the /*members*/ comment into your script file.
JSLint will check the spelling of all property names against
the list. That way, you can have JSLint look for misspellings
for you.
JavaScript uses a C-like syntax which requires the use of semicolons to delimit statements. JavaScript attempts to make semicolons optional with a semicolon insertion mechanism. This is dangerous.
Like C, JavaScript has ++ and -- and ( operators
which can be prefixes or suffixes. The disambiguation is done by the semicolon.
In JavaScript, a linefeed can be whitespace or it can act as a semicolon. This replaces one ambiguity with another.
JSLint expects that every statement be followed by ; except
for for, function, if, switch, try, and
while. JSLint does not expect to see unnecessary semicolons or the
empty statement.
As a further defense against the semicolon insertion mechanism, JSLint
expects long statements to be broken only after one of these punctuation
characters or operators:
, . ; : { } ( [ = < > ? ! + - * / % ~ ^ | &
== != <= >= += -= *= /= %= ^= |= &= << >>
|| &&
=== !== <<= >>= >>> >>>=
JSLint does not expect to see a long statement broken after
an identifier, a string, a number, closer, or a suffix operator:
) ] ++ --
JSLint allows you to turn on the Tolerate sloppy line
breaking (laxbreak) option.
Semicolon insertion can mask copy/paste errors. If you always break lines after operators, then JSLint can do better at finding them.
The comma operator can lead to excessively tricky expressions. It can also mask some programming errors.
JSLint expects to see the comma used as a separator, but not as an
operator (except in the initialization and incrementation parts of the for
statement). It does not expect to see elided elements in array literals. Extra
commas should not be used. A comma should not appear after the last element
of an array literal or object literal because it can be misinterpreted by some
browsers.
JSLint expects that if and for
statements will be made with blocks {that is, with statements
enclosed in braces}.
JavaScript allows an if to be written like this:
if (condition)
statement;
That form is known to contribute to mistakes in projects where many programmers
are working on the same code. That is why JSLint expects the use of
a block:
if (condition) {
statements;
}
Experience shows that this form is more resilient.
In many languages, a block introduces a scope. Variables introduced in a block are not visible outside of the block.
In JavaScript, blocks do not introduce a scope. There is only function-scope. A variable introduced anywhere in a function is visible everywhere in the function. JavaScript's blocks confuse experienced programmers and lead to errors because the familiar syntax makes a false promise.
JSLint expects blocks with function, if,
switch, while, for, do,
and try statements and nowhere else. An exception is made
for an unblocked if statement on an else or
for in.
An expression statement is expected to be an assignment or a function/method
call or delete. All other expression statements are considered
to be errors.
for inThe for in statement allows for looping through
the names of all of the properties of an object. Unfortunately, it also
loops through all of the members which were inherited through the prototype
chain. This has the bad side effect of serving up method functions when
the interest is in data members.
The body of every for in statement should be
wrapped in an if statement that does filtering. It can select
for a particular type or range of values, or it can exclude functions,
or it can exclude properties from the prototype. For example,
for (name in object) {
if (object.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
....
}
}
switchA common
error in switch statements is to forget to place a break
statement after each case, resulting in unintended fall-through. JSLint
expects that the statement before the next case or default
is one of these: break, return, or throw.
varJavaScript allows var definitions to occur anywhere
within a function. JSLint is more strict.
JSLint expects that a var will be declared
only once, and that it will be declared before it is used.
JSLint expects that a function
will be declared before it is used.
JSLint expects that parameters will not also be declared
as vars.
JSLint does not expect the arguments array to be declared
as a var.
JSLint does not expect that a var will be defined in a block.
This is because JavaScript blocks do not have block scope. This can have
unexpected consequences. Define all variables at the top of the function.
withThe with statement was intended to provide a shorthand in accessing
members in deeply nested objects. Unfortunately, it behaves very
badly when setting new members. Never use the with statement. Use
a var instead.
JSLint does not expect to see a with statement.
JSLint does not expect to see an assignment statement in
the condition part of an if or for or while
or do statement. This is because it is more
likely that
if (a = b) {
...
}
was intended to be
if (a == b) {
...
}
If you really intend an assignment, wrap it in another set of parens:
if ((a = b)) {
...
}
The == and != operators do type coercion before
comparing. This is bad because it causes ' \t\r\n' == 0 to
be true. This can mask type errors.
When comparing to any of the following values, use the === or !==
operators, which do not do type coercion.
0 '' undefined null false true
If you want the type coercion, then use the short form. Instead of
(foo != 0)
just say
(foo)
and instead of
(foo == 0)
say
(!foo)
The === and !== operators are preferred. There
is a Disallow == and != (eqeqeq) option which requires
the use of === and !== in all cases.
JavaScript allows any statement to have a label, and labels have a
separate name space. JSLint is more strict.
JSLint expects labels only on statements that interact
with break: switch, while,
do, and for. JSLint expects that labels
will be distinct from vars and parameters.
JSLint expects that
a return, break, continue,
or throw statement will be followed by
a } or case or default.
JSLint expects that + will not be followed by
+ or ++, and that - will not be followed
by - or --. A misplaced space can turn + + into ++, an error that is difficult to see. Use parens to avoid confusion..
++ and --The ++ (increment) and -- (decrement)
operators have been known to contribute to bad code by encouraging excessive
trickiness. They are second only to faulty architecture in enabling to
viruses and other security menaces. There is an option that prohibits
the use of these operators.
JavaScript does not have an integer type, but it does have bitwise operators. The bitwise operators convert their operands from floating point to integers and back, so they are not near as efficient as in C or other languages. They are rarely useful in browser applications. The similarity to the logical operators can mask some programming errors. There is an option that prohibits the use of these operators.
eval is evilThe eval function (and its relatives, Function,
setTimeout, and setInterval) provide access
to the JavaScript compiler. This is sometimes necessary, but in most cases
it indicates the presence of extremely bad coding. The eval
function is the most misused feature of JavaScript.
voidIn most C-like languages, void is a type. In
JavaScript, void is a prefix operator that always
returns undefined. JSLint does not expect to
see void because it is confusing and not very useful.
Regular expressions are written in a terse and cryptic notation. JSLint
looks for problems that may cause portability problems. It also attempts
to resolve visual ambiguities by recommending explicit escapement.
JavaScript's syntax for regular expression literals overloads the /
character. To avoid ambiguity, JSLint expects that the character
preceding a regular expression literal is a ( or =
or : or , character.
newConstructors are functions that are designed to be used with the new
prefix. The new prefix creates a new object based on the
function's prototype, and binds that object to the function's implied
this parameter. If you neglect to use the new
prefix, no new object will be made and this will be bound
to the global object. This is a serious
mistake.
JSLint enforces the convention that constructor functions be given
names with initial uppercase. JSLint does not expect to see a function
invocation with an initial uppercase name unless it has the new
prefix. JSLint does not expect to see the new prefix used
with functions whose names do not start with initial uppercase.
JSLint does not expect to see the wrapper forms new Number,
new String, new Boolean.
JSLint does not expect to see new Object (use {}
instead).
JSLint does not expect to see new Array (use []
instead).
There are characters that are handled inconsistently in the various implementations, and so must be escaped when placed in strings.
\u0000-\u001f \u007f-\u009f \u00ad \u0600-\u0604 \u070f \u17b4 \u17b5 \u200c-\u200f \u2028-\u202f \u2060-\u206f \ufeff \ufff0-\uffff
JSLint does not do flow analysis to determine that variables are assigned
values before used. This is because variables are given a value (undefined)
which is a reasonable default for many applications.
JSLint does not do any kind of global analysis. It does not
attempt to determine that functions used with new are really
constructors (except by enforcing capitalization conventions), or that
method names are spelled correctly.
JSLint is able to handle HTML text. It can inspect the JavaScript content
contained within <script>...</script> tags. It
also inspects the HTML content, looking for problems that are known to interfere
with JavaScript:
</p>)
must have a close tag.< must be used for literal '<'.JSLint is less anal than the sycophantic conformity demanded
by XHTML, but more strict than the popular browsers.
JSLint also checks for the occurrence of '</' in
string literals. You should always write '<\/' instead.
The extra backslash is ignored by the JavaScript compiler but not by the
HTML parser. Tricks like this should not be necessary, and yet they are.
There is an option that allows use of upper case tagnames. There is also an option that allows the use of inline HTML event handlers.
If JSLint is able to complete its scan, it generates a function
report. It lists for each function:
JSLint
will "guess" the name.The report will also include a list of all of the member names that were used. There is a list of JSLint messages.
adsafe |
true if ADsafe.org
rules widget pattern should be enforced. |
bitwise |
true if bitwise operators should not be allowed |
browser |
true if the standard browser globals should be predefined
|
cap |
true if upper case HTML should be allowed |
debug |
true if debugger statements should be
allowed |
eqeqeq |
true if === should be required |
evil |
true if eval should be allowed |
forin |
true if unfiltered for in
statements should be allowed |
fragment |
true if HTML fragments should be allowed |
indent |
the number of spaces used for indentation (default is 4) |
laxbreak |
true if statement breaks should not be checked |
nomen |
true if names should be checked for initial underbars |
on |
true if HTML event handlers should be allowed |
onevar |
true if only one var statement per function
should be allowed |
passfail |
true if the scan should stop on first error |
plusplus |
true if ++ and -- should
not be allowed |
predef |
an array of strings, the names of predefined global variables |
regexp |
true if . should not be allowed in RegExp
literals |
rhino |
true if the Rhino
environment globals should be predefined |
safe |
true if the safe subset rules are enforced. These rules
are used by ADsafe. |
sidebar |
true if the Windows
Sidebar Gadgets globals should be predefined |
strict |
true if the ES3.1 "use strict"; pragma
is required. |
sub |
true if subscript notation may be used for expressions
better expressed in dot notation |
undef |
true if undefined global variables are errors |
white |
true if strict whitespace rules apply |
widget |
true if the Yahoo
Widgets globals should be predefined |
The implementation of JSLint accepts an option
object that allows you to determine the subset of JavaScript that is acceptable
to you. It is also possible to set those options within the source of
a script.
An option specification can look like this:
/*jslint nomen: true, debug: true,
evil: false, onevar: true */
An option specification starts with /*jslint. Notice that
there is no space before the j. The specification contains
a sequence of name value pairs, where the names are JSLint
options, and the values are true or false. An
option specification takes precedence over the option object.
Please let me know if JSLint is useful for you. Is it too
strict? Is there a check or a report that could speed up your
debugging? douglas@crockford.com
I intend to continue to adapt JSLint based on your comments.
Keep watching for improvements. Updates are announced at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jslint_com/.
Try it. Paste your script into the window and click the button. The analysis is done by a script running on your machine. Your script is not sent over the network.
It is also available as a Konfabulator widget. You can check a file by dragging it and dropping it on the widget. You can recheck the file by double-clicking the widget.
It is also available in a WSH Command Line version.
It is also available in a Rhino Command Line version.
JSLint will hurt your feelings.
JSLint uses a Pratt
Parser (Top Down Operator Precedence). It is written in JavaScript.
The full source code is available: